Philadelphia oc video - negative encounter

[tyc]

... the complaint as filed by legal counsel for Mr. Fiorino is ... Simple, straight forward. it appears to "hit the nail on the head."
... It specifically seeks to hold each and everyone of the individuals involved accountable as well.

States and lessor government do misbehave ... often. Those engaged in OC are not the only victims of incompetence when it comes to law and law enforcement and If you're a victim take the time to review "the law page" at the beginning of these forms ("Practicing Pro Se"), ... you'll get an idea as to just how easy it is to compel government agents when "acting under color of law" to behave.

Has anyone heard how well or not at this point the litigation by Mr. Fiorino is going?

tyc

 

[Curmudgeon]

If you are referring to Mr. Fiorino's case, see post #7 in this thread.

If you are referring to the incident in the original post of this thread, I will have to dig that out, but the video posted at the beginning here was not Fiorino, in case that needed clarifying.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[tyc]

If you are referring to Mr. Fiorino's case, see post #7 in this thread.
If you are referring to the incident in the original post of this thread, I will have to dig that out, but the video posted at the beginning here was not Fiorino, in case that needed clarifying.

Yes, some clarifying is desired.

I was under the impression that the video at the begining of this tread was one in which Mr. Fiorino was involved, which resulted in him filing an action in the US 3rd District. I have a copy of that filing.

If it is the case that another individual was involved in the vido which started this thread, I have to ask, did that individual file an action against the LEO(s) involved?

tyc

 

[Curmudgeon]

Yes, some clarifying is desired.

I was under the impression that the video at the begining of this tread was one in which Mr. Fiorino was involved, which resulted in him filing an action in the US 3rd District. I have a copy of that filing.

If it is the case that another individual was involved in the vido which started this thread, I have to ask, did that individual file an action against the LEO(s) involved?

tyc

Short answer: yes.

Perhaps some of the confusion is that he (Mr. Rodriguez) and Mr. Fiorino have since met, and Fiorino is helping him with this, as a citizen.

Here is his post about what he is doing about it:

So Viper (Fiorino) and I went to The PPD's IA office on Thursday 12-6-12. I filed my report and my statement of what happened. They gave me a copy for my records and said that I should hear from someone within 2 weeks. The officer who took my report asked if this was recently on the news. I guess they were already aware of the incident.

And:

So I missed a piece of certified mail from the PPD yesterday. I'll update y'all's on it's contents when I pick it up later...
~
...The letter was just stating that they received my IA complaint and it has been assigned a control number. It also stated that i would hear back from the IA division 10 business days from Dec 17th.

^And this brings the incident up to the current day.
.

 

[tyc]

Short answer: yes.
Perhaps some of the confusion is that he (Mr. Rodriguez) and Mr. Fiorino have since met, and Fiorino is helping him with this, as a citizen.

Thanks for the comeback ... but the type of "action" I'm talking about is a civil action in either the Commonwealth Court or the federal 3rd district. Filing a complaint with PPD IA has an excellent chance of being a waste of time for the plaintiff and odds are the LEO(s) and their superiors will learn little or nothing from the encounter.

tyc