S.E.WI
Regular Member
imported post
In 1856, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local law-enforcement had no duty to protect individuals, but only a general duty to enforce the laws. (10) In 1982, the U.S. Court of Appeals held that "there is no Constitutional right to be protected by the state against criminals or madmen. The Constitution does not require Federal or State government to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order."(11)
I know that no one or very few want to inform LE of their intent to OC. I would suggest reading about these cases, and the cases after 1983,before makinga decision. The cases after 1982 that had The Civil Rights Act (1983), every person that denies a right is liable for injury, was more or less thrown out. I would think a denial to OC in writing and/or a DC charge that was drummed up would be proof that your rights were denied. There was even verb-age on how the Constitution was for limiting the power of government. The major problemI see with this is that you end up dead and your family collects.
The more I read, the more I see how these :cuss:'s talk out of both sides of their mouths. Surprised? No. The degree of contradiction for educated people was a surprise though.
In 1856, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local law-enforcement had no duty to protect individuals, but only a general duty to enforce the laws. (10) In 1982, the U.S. Court of Appeals held that "there is no Constitutional right to be protected by the state against criminals or madmen. The Constitution does not require Federal or State government to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order."(11)
I know that no one or very few want to inform LE of their intent to OC. I would suggest reading about these cases, and the cases after 1983,before makinga decision. The cases after 1982 that had The Civil Rights Act (1983), every person that denies a right is liable for injury, was more or less thrown out. I would think a denial to OC in writing and/or a DC charge that was drummed up would be proof that your rights were denied. There was even verb-age on how the Constitution was for limiting the power of government. The major problemI see with this is that you end up dead and your family collects.
The more I read, the more I see how these :cuss:'s talk out of both sides of their mouths. Surprised? No. The degree of contradiction for educated people was a surprise though.