eye95
Well-known member
personally, I just think we should target rapists with predator drones, it will be much easier and cheaper then a trial. have the federal government hear the vitcims side of the story in private, judge if she's accurate, then light his ass up with a hellfire missile. according to you law enforcement and military actions are both justified in dealing with a domestic criminal problem. sounds great to me, what do you think?
or drunk drivers, that kills more people then the A-rabs ever have, lets just have predator drones waste swerving cars from 10,000 feet with a missile strike. think of all the lives that will be saved.
Again, you are mixing military action and law enforcement action. There is no justification for using military action against rapists like there is on a group with whom we are at war.
Really, folks, get a handle on the difference between law enforcement and national defense. They are handled quite differently by different groups and afford their targets with different sets of protections of rights. Heck, the rights structures are wildly different. The reasons you can bring the force of government in the two cases are also immensely different. In one case you have to have PC of a crime to start the process, and then ultimately you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In the other, Congress has to decide that we are at war.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
<o>