• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Arenas - Can his case be challenged?

yankees98a

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
144
Location
, ,
imported post

Arenas was charged with having a gun outside of his home or business.

However he had it at work. Can't he join the right to carry lawsuit or challenge under the 2nd amendment?
 

Alexcabbie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
2,288
Location
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
imported post

I really doubt that Gilbert Arenas would be anywhere near a good test case for the "bear" part of the 2A - or any other part; seeing as at some point he was either (1) MENACING SOMEONE with a gun or (2) playing "Quickdraw McGraw" and goofing with a very real always-assume-it-is-loaded firearm, or so various accounts go.

Defrending Arenas on 2A grounds would make the firearms community look as if we approved of such shenannigans, and doubtless there are Bradyites who are drooling in anticipation of us doing just that.

The much better case would be an armed Virginian who stops for gas, say, and is attacked under circumstances that would in Virginia justify use of lethal force.

Although Arenas may benefit from some future court decision, his case will definitely not be the catalyst. He knew he was in D.C. and still fooled around. If those weapons had stayed in their locked box we wouldn't even be talking about this, but no, he had to take them out and act like a 6-year-old with a cap pistol. So let him take his lumps. Adios, Gil.....:banghead:
 

9MM Owner

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
66
Location
Winchester, Virginia, USA
imported post

Alexcabbie wrote:
I really doubt that Gilbert Arenas would be anywhere near a good test case for the "bear" part of the 2A - or any other part; seeing as at some point he was either (1) MENACING SOMEONE with a gun or (2) playing "Quickdraw McGraw" and goofing with a very real always-assume-it-is-loaded firearm, or so various accounts go.

Defrending Arenas on 2A grounds would make the firearms community look as if we approved of such shenannigans, and doubtless there are Bradyites who are drooling in anticipation of us doing just that.

The much better case would be an armed Virginian who stops for gas, say, and is attacked under circumstances that would in Virginia justify use of lethal force.

Although Arenas may benefit from some future court decision, his case will definitely not be the catalyst. He knew he was in D.C. and still fooled around. If those weapons had stayed in their locked box we wouldn't even be talking about this, but no, he had to take them out and act like a 6-year-old with a cap pistol. So let him take his lumps. Adios, Gil.....:banghead:
The only fitting justice for Arenas is for him to have to serve any time in Communist Maryland. What a Dumba$$!
 

Tess

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
3,837
Location
Bryan, TX
imported post

Further, league rules prohibit him from having guns at his workplace.

One can argue for working to get rules changed. One can argue that laws need to be changed.

But responsible gun owners know and obey gun laws.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

He screwed up... period.

Talent doesn't make you smart... Occupation and celebrity doesn't give youa free pass.Fate in lifeis a consequense of actions.
 
Top