We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :)
Please help by posting all issues here.
The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
The Federalist Paper No. 46 authored by Madison said the following:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed46.asp
Apparently they are, and the armed citizens outnumber any army. As it should be.
If you are referring to this forum's Home page, it has not been maintained since about 2014.
The best place to go is Handgunlaw.us.
https://www.handgunlaw.us/
Pick Florida and go to the open carry section. Here is a direct link.
https://www.handgunlaw.us/states/florida.pdf
Here is a link to the decision.
https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Garland-opinion-9.30.25.pdf
It's amazing how these originations and courts came to the same conclusion I came to four years ago which I posted on this forum. See...
This is an update:
The District court ruled against Green. Here is the link:
https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/1:2024cv00021/305812/43/0.pdf?ts=1751385227
And it is now on appeal. Here is a link to the appeal brief filed on 9/2/2025...
It's amazing that people will vote for their own demise. Or another way to look at it is people will vote for a politician who promises you the world and gives you nothing. And you know it's a lie.
Thanks for posting. It's clear that the State's attorney is making a factitious argument.
But with that said, the attorney for the plaintiff/Baird was not the sharpest knife in the kitchen drawer. If Baird does not prevail I'll be shocked.
9001, I see you deleted your post, which didn't do much good. But you do know there are services out there that will scrub the internet of your personal info for a charge. Good luck!
Wow, threating the owner of the website; I don't think that is the right way to go. After all he is an attorney. I've been involved in copyright cases. They are not a cakewalk. They usually blow-up in the complainers face.
If you had done your due diligence you would have had figured out how to...
Here is the opinion:
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/pipkins-v-city-of-hoover-11th-cir-ruling.pdf
Here is the NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW article the court relied on:
https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/98-NYU-L-Rev-1831.pdf
Here is the Supreme...
If you had to speak then that would be compelled speech. Example, waterboarding. Or the prosecution could offer you immunity from whatever to speak. The teacher demands a student for their opinion and the student declines. The teacher punishes the student for not speaking. That is compelled...